(Originally published in the March 1978 issue of New Libertarian, p.8)
In my previous two columns, I have presented the case for the ultimate
skepticism (i.e. solipsism) as strongly as I could, indicated that it not only
can be defended on rigidly logical grounds (cf. Hume, David, works of), but
also that is seemingly confirmed empirically by the practice of silent-level
meditation.
Of course, I am not a solipsist. Having fathered four children in this highly
competitive society, I have had to confront the nitty-gritty gut-level reality
of the iron laws of economics in a manner and with a persistance
that makes me as much of a believer in "external reality" as any
Marxist or Objectivist could wish.
I have even been on Welfare twice in my 45 years, for over a year each time.
(It is a most educational experience and every libertarian ought to go through
it, just as every Marxist ought to have the experience of running a business
and meeting a payroll.) Nobody who has gone through the rituals of social degregation involved in falling from Associate Editor of Playboy
to Welfare "case" (Americanus nondesirabilis) can be a solipsist. To get off Welfare
and become affluent again, as I have also done, is an even better cure for
solipsism; if I hadn't figured out some of the laws of that part of the
"external world" known as publishing, I would still be on Welfare.
Nonetheless, my skepticism does verge very close to the solipsistic extreme,
and Mr. John Walker had ample excuse to wonder, as he did in NLW 93, how
somebody as close to solipsism as I am does manage to deal with the external,
sensory-sensual, existential world at all.
The answer is the same as Godzilla gave on Saturday Night Live when Baba
Wawa asked him, "How do you and Mrs. Godzilla do
it?"
"Very carefully," said Godzilla. And that's how I deal with
"reality."
As the result of the yogic and alchemical disciplines I have practiced during
the last 15 years, I know that the solipsist position is the minimal truth,
i.e., that all we really know is a stream of sensation. The common sense
hypothesis that there is an Ego ("me") observing/experiencing this
stream, are unprovable, but denying them seems to
lead to worse confusion than (tentatively) accepting them.
But I also know that everything I think I know about the Ego ("me")
and the External World ("it") is woefully little, and very misleading
(more "untrue" than "true") because it is such a
microscopic fragment of what the total Me and the
total Universe must be. Blake said, wisely, that "Every thing Capable of
being Believed is an Image of the Truth;" but it
is also true, as Blake no doubt realized, that Every thing Capable of being
Believed is Self-Hypnosis.
It is emperically known to me, through neurological
experiment, that every time I manage to change to focus of my nervous system, a
new Me appears, and a new External Reality, and that
these mingle in curious ways, and each grows steadily bigger, weirder, more
mysterious and more humorous as my researches proceed.
Artemus Ward put it this way: "The trouble with
most folks is not that they don't know enough but that they know so much that ain't true." Or, in the more slashing style of Neitzsche's soaring sarcasm, "We are all much greater
artists than we realize." Whatever we know of Me
and The Universe through the filter of our nervous system is much more of a
record of the structural functioning of the nervous system itself than it is of
the enormous mysteries of the real Me and real Universe.
That is why Discordianism is such a jolly flavor of
nihilism. There is joy ineffable in freedom from fixed ideas, even if those
trapped in fixed ideas cannot imagine such a state and dread it "as the
devil dreads holy water." Since I am mildly puzzled all the time, I am continously curious and hence passionately involved. I deal
with the world "very carefully" because I respect its mystery,
whereas those who hold fixed ideas deal with the world (and each other) in
blind and brutal ways that each of them can see how mad all the others are but
none can see that his/her own fixed ideas are equally mad.
As Timothy Leary and I write in Neuropolitics
(Peace Press, Los Angeles, 1977), "It is the function of the nervous
system to focus, select, narrow down; to choose from an infinity of
possibilities the biochemical imprints which determing
the tactics and strategies of survival in one place, status in one
tribe. The infant is genetically prepared to learn any language, master any
skill, play any sex role; in a very short time, however, he becomes rigidly
fixated to accept, follow and mimic the limited offerings of his social and
cultural environment...
"Because we are all imprinted with our own social bubbles, it isn't
generally recognized that each reality map held by humans - however eccentric
and paranoid - makes nearly as much sense as any other. People are vegetarians
or nudists or Communists or snake worshippers for the same reasons that other
people are Catholics or Republicans or liberals or Nazis."
This neurological relativism is not incompatible with adopting a belief-system
involving predictions, assumed regularities or "laws," valuations and
ethical judgements, etc. But one recognizes each
belief system as a gamble, "my latest best guess," and does not confuse
it with Truth, Reality or any other variety of eternal verity. Each
belief-system, or reality-tunnel, is temporary - one except to replace it with
a better system, more inclusive, more flexible, more amusing and more precise,
if not by next Tuedsay after lunch, certainly by the
middle of next Winter.
All around one the True Believers trudge by, mouths grim, brows furrowed,
ulcers and worse eating at their innards. This "desperate company of oddfellows" (Thoreau) live in what psychologists call
"cognitive dissonance." Because their reality-maps are, one and all,
too small to cover the vast, eerie, amusing world in which we live, they are
perpetually frustrated: the world does not live up to their fixed beliefs. They
are all convinced that there is something radically wrong with the universe
itself, or with the rest of humanity, and they never suspect that the real
trouble is in their own rigid and robotic nervous systems.
Thus I "believe" in libertarianism, in strict scientific method (the
objective yoga of the West), in yoga (the neuroscience of the East), in Space
Migration, in Life Extension, and in dozens of other things. But I can suspend
any of these beliefs at will, or all of them, and look impassively into the
Buddhist void, or switch around to other beliefs temporarily, to check out how
the world looks to those who hold those beliefs.
Yea, brethern and sistren,
now abideth doubt, hope and charity; these three; and
the greatest of these is doubt. For doubt puffeth not
itself up into pomposity; doubt suffereth long, and
is kind. With doubt all things are possible.